Defense Verdict in Ureteral Injury During Robotic Hysterectomy

Defense Verdict in Ureteral Injury During Robotic Hysterectomy

Senior Trial Partner Anthony M. Sola, assisted by Partner Daniel L. Freidlin and Associate Geoffrey A. Bleau, obtained a defense verdict after a 3-week trial in Supreme Court, Nassau County before Judge Steven Jaeger. The case involved an allegation that the defendant gynecologist negligently injured the 49-year-old patient’s ureter, and then failed to detect the injury intraoperatively, during a DaVinci Robotic assisted hysterectomy. Eight days after discharge, the patient was readmitted to the hospital with a totally transected and necrotic ureter. She underwent several procedures that failed before a successful re-implantation of the ureter was accomplished. She claimed, however, that she suffered from permanent incontinence as a result, among other complaints.

At trial the defense demonstrated the injury was a thermal injury from cauterization of the nearby uterine artery that could not be detected intraoperatively. Consequently, it was a known complication. As to plaintiff’s complaint of a permanent incontinence, we were able to impeach her credibility in various ways, including by demonstrating how subsequent urodynamic testing was inconsistent with her claims.

The jury returned a unanimous verdict of no departures.